'G3' final design
Name | No | Yard No | Builder | Laid down | Launched | Comp | Fate |
i | 627 | Beardmore, Dalmuir | --- | --- | --- | suspended 11.1921, cancelled 2.1922 | |
ii | 497 | John Brown, Clydebank | --- | --- | --- | suspended 11.1921, cancelled 2.1922 | |
iii | 615 | Fairfield, Govan | --- | --- | --- | suspended 11.1921, cancelled 2.1922 | |
iv | 1203 | Swan Hunter, Wallsend | --- | --- | --- | suspended 11.1921, cancelled 2.1922 |
Displacement standard, t |
48400 |
Displacement full, t |
53909 |
Length, m |
250.1 pp 260.9 oa |
Breadth, m |
32.3 |
Draught, m |
10.2 deep |
No of shafts |
4 |
Machinery |
4 sets geared steam turbines, 20 small-tube boilers |
Power, h. p. |
160000 |
Max speed, kts |
31 - 32 |
Fuel, t |
5000 oil |
Endurance, nm(kts) | 7000(16) |
Armour, mm |
main belt: 356 - 305, bulkheads: 305 - 254, turrets: 431 (face), decks: 203 - 102, CT: 305 |
Armament |
3 x 3 - 406/45 BL Mk I, 8 x 2 - 152/50 BL Mk XXII, 6 x 1 - 120/40 QF Mk VIII, 4 x 8 - 40/39 2pdr QF Mk VIII, 2 - 622 TT (fwd, 20), 2 flying-off platforms, 2 airplanes |
Complement |
1716 |
Project history: The Royal Navy was well aware
that it had ended the War in an inferior position vis a vis the American and
Japanese navies. Despite the enormous preponderance of numbers, 305mm-gunned
dreadnoughts were quite outclassed, and even the 343mm- and 381mm-gunned ships
were outclassed by the latest 356mm- and 406mm-gunned 'super-dreadnoughts' laid
down during the War. Drastic reconstruction would remedy the worst deficiencies
of 381mm-gunned ships, but what was needed was a new class of ships capable of
facing 406mm and even 457mm gunfire. There was also an urgent need to
incorporate war lessons: Hood class, despite detailed improvements, was
essentially a pre-Jutland design, and by 1921 there was a large body of fresh
experience based on tests against German ships. The first design required was a
class of four large battlecruisers, to be laid down in 1921. The concept which
evolved was much closer to a fast battleship than anything previously considered
and the US Navy's 'all-or-nothing' concept of protection was embraced. The
latest type of protection was to be used, namely an inclined internal armour
belt and internal 'bulges' against torpedoes.
For the first time a triple turret was adopted to concentrate
armament. The secondary armament was mounted in twin turrets. Various designs
were drawn up, but all had in common a concentration of heavy armour over the
vitals, with turrets grouped together to permit the maximum thickness of armour.
They represented a big a step forward in fighting power as the Dreadnought
had 17 years earlier, and they showed how much the size of capital ships had
increased in little more than a decade.
After lengthy consideration, design 'G 3' (out of an
alphabetical series) was accepted in February 1921, the final legend being
approved in August 1921. Orders followed on 26 October - one each from Beardmore,
John Brown, Fairfield and Swan Hunter (the last with machinery sub-contracted to
Parsons) - but the orders were suspended on 18 November by Cabinet order. The
threat of these ships being built was used as a bargaining counter during the
Washington Conference, but it was quite clear by the end of 1921 that Britain
was in a deepening financial crisis, and the Cabinet would not have permitted
the programme to go ahead, even if the Americans and Japanese had refused to
negotiate reductions in their fleets. Although the ships had not started
construction the details of the design were sufficiently developed to provide a
basis for Nelson and Rodney, truncated versions carrying the same
armament and scale of protection, but 8-9kts slower. Under the terms of the
Treaty the four 'G 3's were cancelled on 13 February 1922. Names were never
allocated, and the two sets of names often quoted are merely speculative: St.
George, St. Andrew, St. David and St. Patrick; or Invincible,
Inflexible, Indomitable and Indefatigable.
Protection: Main
356mm belt with 4.2m depth would protect main
magazines, abreast machinery its thickness would be 305mm, the belt would be
inclined at 18° inside. Main belt would be closed by 305mm and 127mm fore and
254mm and 102mm aft bulkheads, aft part of the belt abreast secondary turrets
was tapered to 229mm at upper and 152mm at lower edges. TT compartment was
protected by shallow 152mm belt extended between citadel and stem and 152mm deck
and 152mm bulkhead. Turrets would have 431mm faces, 330mm sides and rears and
203mm roofs. Barbettes would be protected by 356mm armour over the main deck
from the sides and by 305-279mm armour near the centreline. CT would have 356mm
face, 254mm sides, 102mm rear and floor and 203mm roof, communication tube would
been protected by 203mm armour. Funnel uptakes would have 44-19mm armour. There
would be 4 protected decks: 25mm forecastle deck, upper deck: 203mm over main
magazines, 102-76mm over machinery and 178mm over secondary magazines, 25mm main
deck and medium deck with 152mm armour fwd from citadel and 127-76mm armour aft
from citadel. Steering gear compartment would been protected by 127mm deck and
114mm bulkhead.
Underwater protection could resist the explosion of 343kg TNT and included 44mm longitudinal bulkhead, its deep would be 4.3m.
Many thanks to Borys Estrin for granted additional information
© Ivan Gogin, 2008-14